Thomas Friedman of the NYTimes on Meet the Press today talking about several recent incidents including what happened to Van Jones.
When everyone has a cell phone, everyone is a photographer, when everyone has access to YouTube, everyone is a filmmaker, and when everyone is a blogger everyone is a newspaper.
When everyone is a photographer, a newspaper and a filmaker everyone else is a public figure. Tell your kids ok, be careful every move they make is now a digital footprint. You are on candid camera and unfortunately the real message to young people from all these incidents... (he says holding his hands closely together) is really keep yourself tight - don't say anything controversial, don't think anything controversial, don't put anything in print - you know what ever you do just kind of smooth out all the edges (he says moving his hands in a streamlining motion down) and maybe you too - you know when you get nominated to be ambassador to Burkina Faso will be able to get through the hearing.
What does this capacity to document "everything" digitally mean to free thinking, and free speech? It seems that is having a quelling effect.
I have written about the participatory panopticon several times, a term coined by Jamais Cascio.
* Participatory Panopticon strikes Michael Phelps
* “sousveillance” coming to NYC and Big Brother coming to NYC
* Participatory Panopticon tracking the CIA’s Torture Taxi
* Condi Caught by Emerging Participatory Panopticon
* Accelerating Change Highlights: 1 (Jon Udell)
The first time I spent a whole day with technologists working on the identity layer of the web in 2003 I asked publicly at the end of the day - how do we forgive in these new kinds of tools in place? How do we allow for people to change over time if "everything" is documented?
I hope we can have a dialogue about these kinds of issues via the blogosphere and also face to face at the 9th Internet Identity Workshop coming up in November.
Related posts:
Unconference.net
This reminds me of the Novel "Light of Other Days" by Arthur C. Clarke and Stephen Baxter where new "wormcams" allowed anyone to see anything
Check the Wikipedia link for ino
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Light_of_Other_Days
This has no effect whatsoever on free speech. A person is still free to express whatever opinion they may hold. Society is also still free to remember that expression and take it into account in the future. Free speech is not a free lunch...