Comments on: OpenID Momentum continues http://www.identitywoman.net/openid-momentum-continues#utm_source=feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed Saving the World With User-Centric Identity Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:35:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: David Laurellhttp://www.identitywoman.net/openid-momentum-continues/comment-page-1#comment-204228 David Laurell Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:27:12 +0000 http://www.identitywoman.net/?p=863#comment-204228 But you do want the user to specify a username right? Because openid-addresses can look rather nasty, just look at yahoo's openids. Here I mean social sites with your own profile and stuff like that, not a simple form to comment on a blog. So what I'm trying to say is that in some cases you can't get away from the registration form. But you do want the user to specify a username right? Because openid-addresses can look rather nasty, just look at yahoo's openids. Here I mean social sites with your own profile and stuff like that, not a simple form to comment on a blog. So what I'm trying to say is that in some cases you can't get away from the registration form.

]]> By: Mortimer Snerdhttp://www.identitywoman.net/openid-momentum-continues/comment-page-1#comment-203863 Mortimer Snerd Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:10:57 +0000 http://www.identitywoman.net/?p=863#comment-203863 Is it generally agreed among supporters of OpenID that OpenID is just good for low assurance stuff like leaving blog postings? Higher assurance stuff, such as age verification or other identity verification, needs some sort of trust framework, so the RP trusts the assertion from the OP. That doesn't exist in OpenID, right? I don't think PAPE provides this; the RP still need to trust the OP. Is the OpenID community trying to build a trust framework for OpenID? Or is it conceded that high assurance stuff will use some other solution (PKI? InfoCards? Other?) BTW, why do you need my email address for a blog comment? Aren't you sort of trying to figure out who I really am? Is it generally agreed among supporters of OpenID that OpenID is just good for low assurance stuff like leaving blog postings? Higher assurance stuff, such as age verification or other identity verification, needs some sort of trust framework, so the RP trusts the assertion from the OP. That doesn't exist in OpenID, right? I don't think PAPE provides this; the RP still need to trust the OP. Is the OpenID community trying to build a trust framework for OpenID? Or is it conceded that high assurance stuff will use some other solution (PKI? InfoCards? Other?)

BTW, why do you need my email address for a blog comment? Aren't you sort of trying to figure out who I really am?

]]> By: Fabio Turelhttp://www.identitywoman.net/openid-momentum-continues/comment-page-1#comment-203830 Fabio Turel Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:32:28 +0000 http://www.identitywoman.net/?p=863#comment-203830 I just hope that this sort of geeky reputation, coupled with problems in user experience, will not drive the demand away from OpenId, and towards proprietary solutions. Identity management is way too important to be carelessly delegated to a specific social network platform and on the basis of other, unrelated, factors... I just hope that this sort of geeky reputation, coupled with problems in user experience, will not drive the demand away from OpenId, and towards proprietary solutions. Identity management is way too important to be carelessly delegated to a specific social network platform and on the basis of other, unrelated, factors...

]]>