<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Missing: Privileged Account Management for the Social Web.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.identitywoman.net/missing-privilidged-account-management-for-the-social-web/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.identitywoman.net/missing-privilidged-account-management-for-the-social-web#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link> <description>Saving the World With User-Centric Identity</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:35:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: bonj</title><link>http://www.identitywoman.net/missing-privilidged-account-management-for-the-social-web/comment-page-1#comment-267038</link> <dc:creator>bonj</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 03:29:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.identitywoman.net/missing-privilidged-account-management-for-the-social-web#comment-267038</guid> <description>Specific to Twitter, I like HootSuite.  I just upgraded to version 2.0, which came out this week.  2.0 didn&#039;t really change much in regards to account management, which was already good, but the interface is more TweetDeck like, yet within your browser.  As you are really managing HootSuite accounts, the Twitter Account credentials are not given to users, yet HootSuite allows one access to post to Twitter Profiles, based upon how accounts are administered in HootSuite. You can checkout their video tour http://ow.ly/iBUh of 2.0.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Specific to Twitter, I like HootSuite.  I just upgraded to version 2.0, which came out this week.  2.0 didn't really change much in regards to account management, which was already good, but the interface is more TweetDeck like, yet within your browser.  As you are really managing HootSuite accounts, the Twitter Account credentials are not given to users, yet HootSuite allows one access to post to Twitter Profiles, based upon how accounts are administered in HootSuite. You can checkout their video tour <a
href="http://ow.ly/iBUh" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/iBUh</a> of 2.0.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt Flynn</title><link>http://www.identitywoman.net/missing-privilidged-account-management-for-the-social-web/comment-page-1#comment-265194</link> <dc:creator>Matt Flynn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:00:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.identitywoman.net/missing-privilidged-account-management-for-the-social-web#comment-265194</guid> <description>Oh, and apps like Chatterbox should help.  I actually think it&#039;s preferable to have individual contributers rather than a master account - I think that approach is more in-line with what will be effective in social media.  Chatterbox would allow multiple support reps to monitor, share, discuss internally and post from a single Twitter account.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and apps like Chatterbox should help.  I actually think it's preferable to have individual contributers rather than a master account - I think that approach is more in-line with what will be effective in social media.  Chatterbox would allow multiple support reps to monitor, share, discuss internally and post from a single Twitter account.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt Flynn</title><link>http://www.identitywoman.net/missing-privilidged-account-management-for-the-social-web/comment-page-1#comment-265193</link> <dc:creator>Matt Flynn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:57:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.identitywoman.net/missing-privilidged-account-management-for-the-social-web#comment-265193</guid> <description>Interesting question.  Is there a reason traditional PAM solutions wouldn&#039;t help with social web apps?...I would&#039;ve assumed they can handle these the same as any other apps.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting question.  Is there a reason traditional PAM solutions wouldn't help with social web apps?...I would've assumed they can handle these the same as any other apps.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
