<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Legal Haze for Social networks. Identity and Freedom of Expression.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.identitywoman.net/legal-haze-for-social-networks-identity-and-freedom-of-expression/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.identitywoman.net/legal-haze-for-social-networks-identity-and-freedom-of-expression#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link> <description>Saving the World With User-Centric Identity</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:35:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: David Kearns</title><link>http://www.identitywoman.net/legal-haze-for-social-networks-identity-and-freedom-of-expression/comment-page-1#comment-259974</link> <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:12:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.identitywoman.net/legal-haze-for-social-networks-identity-and-freedom-of-expression#comment-259974</guid> <description>The sites get a pass on this because there&#039;s nothing illegal about the activity. No more so than a winery tweeting it&#039;s followers about the latest vintage (which it&#039;s illegal to ship to many places and illegal to buy in others).
Of course, these postings could be taken as a &quot;solicitation to buy&quot; which could run afoul of the CA law...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sites get a pass on this because there's nothing illegal about the activity. No more so than a winery tweeting it's followers about the latest vintage (which it's illegal to ship to many places and illegal to buy in others).</p><p>Of course, these postings could be taken as a "solicitation to buy" which could run afoul of the CA law...</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
