<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: IIW is NOT an advocacy group - sigh &quot;the media&quot;</title> <atom:link href="http://www.identitywoman.net/iiw-is-not-an-advocacy-group-sigh-the-media/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.identitywoman.net/iiw-is-not-an-advocacy-group-sigh-the-media#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link> <description>Saving the World With User-Centric Identity</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:35:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Johannes Ernst</title><link>http://www.identitywoman.net/iiw-is-not-an-advocacy-group-sigh-the-media/comment-page-1#comment-340038</link> <dc:creator>Johannes Ernst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 08:10:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.identitywoman.net/iiw-is-not-an-advocacy-group-sigh-the-media#comment-340038</guid> <description>So you claim that you don&#039;t have a formal title in a formal (presumably large) organization, and you still exist?
Clearly impossible. You must be wrong about this existence of your&#039;s, and you compound your error, very clearly, by claiming to also have an opinion -- and worse one that matters.
I&#039;m sure that if you repent, you will be quoted correctly in the article that covers that.
Almost a user-centric (as opposed to organization-centric) model ... can&#039;t be.
Happy Holidays!!! ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you claim that you don't have a formal title in a formal (presumably large) organization, and you still exist?</p><p>Clearly impossible. You must be wrong about this existence of your's, and you compound your error, very clearly, by claiming to also have an opinion -- and worse one that matters.</p><p>I'm sure that if you repent, you will be quoted correctly in the article that covers that.</p><p>Almost a user-centric (as opposed to organization-centric) model ... can't be.</p><p>Happy Holidays!!! <img
src='http://www.identitywoman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
