Saving the World with User-centric Identity.
IIW is NOT an advocacy group – sigh “the media”

Posted on Friday 18 December 2009

Facebook’s Online Identity War quotes me and labels IIW an advocacy group. IT IS AN INDUSTRY FORUM. Douglas MacMillan.

Sorry but I am still learning “how” to talk to reporters. They don’t like to quote me as “the identity woman” and link to my blog.

I “do” run the Identity Workshop with Phil and Doc but that doesn’t make it an “advocacy group”

Identity Commons & IIW have a purpose and principles believing in user/centric identity. The power of individuals to manage and control their own identities online. We don’t “advocate” for them – we create a convening space for people who want to work on this ideal.

Facebook does on some level “agree” with the idea of user-centric identity – Luke Shepard has participated in the community for quite a while & they hired David Recordon. They sponsor IIW.

I am clear that the opening up of previously controlled information with no warning “jives” with my understanding of user-centric control. It was more from my own point of view I was commenting. That is with my “identity woman” hat on… and the values I carry from Planetwork and the ASN… but the press hates that. Uggg. Chris Messina gets to be an “open web advocate”… that is what I do to but just about identity “open Identity advocate” (mmm…) but then that sounds like “just” OpenID and it isn’t just about that one particular protocol. sigh.

I am still wondering – How does one “belong” and have “titles” in a way the media can GROK when one does not have a formal position in a formal organization.

sigh – identity issues.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. At Burton Group Catalyst! Exciting week ahead.
  2. International Telecommunications Union Focus Group on Identity Management
  3. Identity Gang now a group in Second Life
  4. I own MY Identity
  5. Burton Group coming up this week


1 Comment for 'IIW is NOT an advocacy group – sigh “the media”'

  1.  
    December 19, 2009 | 1:10 am
     

    So you claim that you don’t have a formal title in a formal (presumably large) organization, and you still exist?

    Clearly impossible. You must be wrong about this existence of your’s, and you compound your error, very clearly, by claiming to also have an opinion — and worse one that matters.

    I’m sure that if you repent, you will be quoted correctly in the article that covers that.

    Almost a user-centric (as opposed to organization-centric) model … can’t be.

    Happy Holidays!!! ;-)

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Information for comment users
Line and paragraph breaks are implemented automatically. Your e-mail address is never displayed. Please consider what you're posting.

Use the buttons below to customise your comment.


RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI

 

Powered by Web Design Company Plugins