<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Identity and personal control on horizon in web 2.0 2009  predictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.identitywoman.net/identity-and-personal-control-on-horizon-in-web-20-2009-predictions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.identitywoman.net/identity-and-personal-control-on-horizon-in-web-20-2009-predictions#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Saving the World With User-Centric Identity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 07:30:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Identity events of the year - Part 1 &#124; Identity Woman</title>
		<link>http://www.identitywoman.net/identity-and-personal-control-on-horizon-in-web-20-2009-predictions/comment-page-1#comment-196809</link>
		<dc:creator>Identity events of the year - Part 1 &#124; Identity Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 00:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.identitywoman.net/?p=801#comment-196809</guid>
		<description>[...] It continues here with Part 2. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It continues here with Part 2. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Camp</title>
		<link>http://www.identitywoman.net/identity-and-personal-control-on-horizon-in-web-20-2009-predictions/comment-page-1#comment-184189</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Camp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.identitywoman.net/?p=801#comment-184189</guid>
		<description>Sounds dead on to me. 
I agree that one company or a small set of companies having preferred access/control over user data is not ideal. Sadly, I&#039;m not sure that concentrated control won&#039;t become the norm. Our economic and political systems have strong tendencies to concentrate power - it&#039;s a recurring collective action problem where a small number of players (facebook, google, msft, etc...) have access to lower cost &quot;cooperation&quot; (collusion) than 6 billion citizens of the world - despite the fact that net social benefit would be maximized by a non-collusive approach.
Despite this historical tendency I hope that the power of the net to decentralize / distribute decision making power will lead to more user control over their own data. It&#039;s an ongoing battle and the open stack, data portability, etc.. are all fighting the good fight here.
One other thought, tied to biz models - I have a sense that the most fruitful pathway to user controlled data is focusing on $$$. Recast privacy concerns as monetary ones, where data=gold and control over your data translates into income. 
Advertising offers a quick and easy entry point. Imagine a scenario where only the user controls access to their entire pool of data. Individual sites may have access to some subset of the data pool but ad delivery/targeting efficiency presumably correlates positively to the size of the data pool. Advertisers would then have a preference for targeting ads based on the complete data pool, which only the user has access too and which the user could $ell to the highest bidder. 
There are some technical hurdles to providing translucent data (vs. full transparency) but we went to the moon &amp; decoded the human genome so I&#039;m crossing my fingers that we&#039;ll be able to build secure, flexible, translucent identity/data systems in the near future.
Anyway, those are my morning thoughts on Identity &amp; Data. Thanks for the great work in this space.
Best,
Chris Camp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds dead on to me.<br />
I agree that one company or a small set of companies having preferred access/control over user data is not ideal. Sadly, I&#8217;m not sure that concentrated control won&#8217;t become the norm. Our economic and political systems have strong tendencies to concentrate power &#8211; it&#8217;s a recurring collective action problem where a small number of players (facebook, google, msft, etc&#8230;) have access to lower cost &#8220;cooperation&#8221; (collusion) than 6 billion citizens of the world &#8211; despite the fact that net social benefit would be maximized by a non-collusive approach.<br />
Despite this historical tendency I hope that the power of the net to decentralize / distribute decision making power will lead to more user control over their own data. It&#8217;s an ongoing battle and the open stack, data portability, etc.. are all fighting the good fight here.<br />
One other thought, tied to biz models &#8211; I have a sense that the most fruitful pathway to user controlled data is focusing on $$$. Recast privacy concerns as monetary ones, where data=gold and control over your data translates into income.<br />
Advertising offers a quick and easy entry point. Imagine a scenario where only the user controls access to their entire pool of data. Individual sites may have access to some subset of the data pool but ad delivery/targeting efficiency presumably correlates positively to the size of the data pool. Advertisers would then have a preference for targeting ads based on the complete data pool, which only the user has access too and which the user could $ell to the highest bidder.<br />
There are some technical hurdles to providing translucent data (vs. full transparency) but we went to the moon &amp; decoded the human genome so I&#8217;m crossing my fingers that we&#8217;ll be able to build secure, flexible, translucent identity/data systems in the near future.<br />
Anyway, those are my morning thoughts on Identity &amp; Data. Thanks for the great work in this space.<br />
Best,<br />
Chris Camp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
